Previously I explored the complexities
of the GERD on Egypt and Sudan and the havoc it was creating for the ability
for downstream riparians to ensure reliable water supply and food security. Over
the next few blogs, I will explore the construction of the Gibe III dam in the
Omo-Turkana region and its effects on food and water, starting with an overview.
The Omo-Turkana region in southern Ethiopia and northern Kenya is unique in the rate of change occurring. The construction of the Gibe III dam in Ethiopia and associated large-scale commercial farming is resulting in catastrophic hydrological and ecological changes to the Omo-Turkana region. Lake Turkana is the world’s largest desert lake with the River Omo supplying 80-90% of its inflows (Hodbod et al. 2019). Roughly 300,000 people depend on the lake’s resources– through fishing, pasture and even for drinking water, but the building of the Gibe III will likely reduce these flows by 60-70% (Car 2012).
Not only will the filling of the
dam affect the water basin, but also the planned large-scale plantation
developments that is substituting the basin’s natural capital. Ethiopia has proposed
to resettle the riverine communities and instead, develop large plantations,
the Kuraz Sugar plantation (Avery
2012). A study discovered that the proposed the large-scale irrigation
schemes for the plantations will abstract 50% of the Omo river, permanently
impacting ecology through diminishing the lake level (ibid). Essentially 80% of
the basin will now controlled, dampening the volume and seasonality of inflows
from the Omo river, reducing downstream productivity as there will be less nutrient
deposition (Tebbs
2014).
Mitigation measures by the
Ethiopian government, especially surrounding the resettlement schemes, have been
unsuccessful in sufficiently waning the risk of food insecurity for the riverine communities that are so
dependent on the Omo-Turkana basin, following disruptions caused by the dam and
proposed plantation developments (Hodbod
et al. 2019).
The Gibe III dam’s construction
poses significant threat to the livelihood of the riverine communities that it
feeds. The tremendous loss in water level and nutrients perpetually affects the
ecological makeup of the basin. Like the Nile basin, the Omo-Turkana basin is
fragile and vital for those living around it. It is the lifeline for so many.
I have made a lot of large
remarks about the effects of the Gibe’s construction, so I should really back them
up with evidence right. Stay tuned and I will do just that.
This is a great post Maha, it was really insightful. It would be interesting to know what sort of agricultural industry this area has. What do they grow? Also, considering the implications of the Gibe construction, what do you think can be done to reduce the impacts? Could they release the dam water to recreate a natural regime? It would be lovely to get your opinion.
ReplyDeleteThe Omo-Turkana basin is home to indigenous communities that grow crops like grains for their own use, subsistence farming. I believe that added communication and a risk analysis including them as a stakeholder is needed. And yes, I think some releases that help to mimic natural variations will allow fish populations to grow and provide enough water to rejuvenate the ecosystem and allow for irrigation.
Delete